Priced against your volume
Screening volume, chain coverage and how often you call the API differ from desk to desk, so the rate is quoted against what you actually run rather than a published tier.
Wallet screening and on-chain risk intelligence
Screen any address and get a verdict, along with the money trail behind it. Coverage runs to 40+ blockchains.
{ "address": "0x7f36…be1b", "chain": "ethereum" }
{
"verdict": "FLAGGED",
"risk_score": 87,
"confidence": 0.91,
"evidence": {
"connected_to": "0x098b…f21c",
"list": "SDN",
"path_len": "multiple",
"path": "attached to the result"
}
}Indirect exposure to an SDN wallet. Example response, not from a live account.
Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tron among 40+ blockchains.
Built for the examiner
We line up with the obligations you are held to.
Recommendation 15 screening expectations and the published red-flag typologies.
Sanctions screening against the SDN list, snapshot-versioned so any decision can be replayed.
VASP wallet screening and the record-keeping obligations that follow it.
Audit trails a CASP can hand to a supervisor without rebuilding them.
Pricing
No price is printed here, because what you pay should follow what you run. We quote against your volume, and we carry the cost of getting you live.
Screening volume, chain coverage and how often you call the API differ from desk to desk, so the rate is quoted against what you actually run rather than a published tier.
Your account opens with credits so wiring up the API, tuning thresholds and replaying old cases do not draw down a budget before anything reaches production.
What comes back
Each result arrives with the reasoning attached, so an analyst can act on it without going away to build the case first.
Nothing connects this address to a sanctioned or illicit source.
The trail reaches a custodian, where one wallet holds thousands of customers and the funds stop being separable. The boundary is named in the result.
Exposure to a sanctioned or illicit source, direct or through intermediaries. The connecting path comes with it.
Analysis
Value is tracked forward through the transfer graph and resolved to the entities behind it, so a result rests on the transactions themselves.
Full transaction history is pulled around every designated address.
Indirect exposure is traced forward through the transfer graph and attributed back to its source.
Both run in parallel and are reconciled, so an exposure share can be checked against a second method.
Thousands of counterfeit contracts impersonate the major stablecoins. Matching on a ticker symbol waves all of them through.
Typologies
These structures turn up again and again in designated wallets, and each one leaves a signature in the graph that survives a change of address.
Value relays one-to-one through fresh addresses, each forwarding almost everything it takes in.
A wallet splits funds across thousands of counterparties at once, betting nobody follows every branch.
Value returns to the wallet it started from after passing through intermediaries under the same control.
A single address taking receipt from multiple unrelated sanctioned entities, with no exchange label attached to any of them.
Platform
The modelling stack behind zScreen is the one we already run on behavioural data at scale. Pointing it at the transfer graph changed the inputs, not the machinery.
Confirmed designations are the only hard labels that exist on a chain. The ensemble fits them against repeated random draws of everything else and votes on the result, so an address is never assumed clean for the sake of the arithmetic.
Addresses under one actor never straddle a train and test split, so the model cannot flatter itself by recognising a cluster it already memorised.
Every verdict carries a calibrated interval derived from how complete the underlying history was, so a thin record never arrives looking like a full one.
Technique index
Inside one alert
The result says what it saw and which way each thing pushed the score, in wording an analyst and an auditor read the same way.
| What we saw | Effect | How sure |
|---|---|---|
| Money moved straight back out within a day | Raises risk | Strong |
| Funds passed along in a chain of one-to-one transfers | Raises risk | Strong |
| Most of the outgoing value went to an exchange | Raises risk | Moderate |
| The wallet has very little history behind it | Lowers risk | Weak |
An illustrative alert, in the wording an analyst sees on screen.
Ready to get on a call?
Book a demo